<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/</link>
	<description>blog of kris hoet - geek marketer // change architect @duvalguillaume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 09:46:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terraplane &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft looks to give MSN fresh wings &#124; Beyond Binary &#8211; CNET News</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terraplane &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Microsoft looks to give MSN fresh wings &#124; Beyond Binary &#8211; CNET News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Microsoft Advertising (crossthebreeze.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft Advertising (crossthebreeze.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marketing consultants</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marketing consultants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;marketing consultants...&lt;/strong&gt;

...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>marketing consultants&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philippe</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[philippe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice. really. but I don&#039;t buy it. why would that be?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice. really. but I don&#8217;t buy it. why would that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Advertising - Some minor issues</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Microsoft Advertising - Some minor issues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Just say this nice video at cross the breeze. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just say this nice video at cross the breeze. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james warren</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james warren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice, i like it.  does exactly what it says on the tin: you can deliver truly &#039;inline&#039; channel agnostic advertising.  i think the interesting opportunity for Msft is around not calling it advertising any more - because in any conventional definition of the word, your promise isn&#039;t really &#039;advertising&#039;.  your promise is around engagement]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, i like it.  does exactly what it says on the tin: you can deliver truly &#8216;inline&#8217; channel agnostic advertising.  i think the interesting opportunity for Msft is around not calling it advertising any more &#8211; because in any conventional definition of the word, your promise isn&#8217;t really &#8216;advertising&#8217;.  your promise is around engagement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurensvdw</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurensvdw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/microsoft-advertising-2/#comment-32086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No offence but really being interested I&#039;m kind of disappointed after watching this great looking video. It contains a lot of words and one clear message (the baseline at the end) but doesn&#039;t really explain a lot. Or is it just me? Could be.

Off course looking at it from a commercial point of view, this &#039;commercial&#039; is job well done, no doubt about that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offence but really being interested I&#8217;m kind of disappointed after watching this great looking video. It contains a lot of words and one clear message (the baseline at the end) but doesn&#8217;t really explain a lot. Or is it just me? Could be.</p>
<p>Off course looking at it from a commercial point of view, this &#8216;commercial&#8217; is job well done, no doubt about that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

