<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content is King, Distribution is Queen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/</link>
	<description>blog of kris hoet - geek marketer // change architect @duvalguillaume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Content Marketing and the Hegelian Dialectic - Matthew T Grant</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-35441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Content Marketing and the Hegelian Dialectic - Matthew T Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-35441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the olden days, the watchword was: &#8220;Content is King!&#8221; Thinking on this now, however, I&#8217;m not sure that that it was ever really [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the olden days, the watchword was: &#8220;Content is King!&#8221; Thinking on this now, however, I&#8217;m not sure that that it was ever really [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond the hype &#171; &#8216;Cross The Breeze</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-29867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beyond the hype &#171; &#8216;Cross The Breeze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-29867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on this statement, more than anything else this has sparked many discussion already and also I have written about it before. Mitch Joel says content is everything, Doc Searls said right the opposite and I respect them both, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this statement, more than anything else this has sparked many discussion already and also I have written about it before. Mitch Joel says content is everything, Doc Searls said right the opposite and I respect them both, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geertd</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geertd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 06:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the phrase should become: &quot;Content is king and distribution is in the hands of the consumer&quot;.

Geert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the phrase should become: &#8220;Content is king and distribution is in the hands of the consumer&#8221;.</p>
<p>Geert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve George</title>
		<link>http://crossthebreeze.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossthebreeze.wordpress.com/2006/08/10/content-is-king-distribution-is-queen/#comment-801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading the link it seems the authors specifically talking about sites where your aim is to get them there and get them to buy.  That&#039;s fine if you&#039;re looking for a one short commercial push.

But, it&#039;s only with good content that you can get your customers to understand your values and associate themselves with you.  That&#039;s a much deeper relationship.

I do think the content has to be relevant.  Long pages of boring text may be good for the search engine to index but lots of people don&#039;t want to read too much!

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the link it seems the authors specifically talking about sites where your aim is to get them there and get them to buy.  That&#8217;s fine if you&#8217;re looking for a one short commercial push.</p>
<p>But, it&#8217;s only with good content that you can get your customers to understand your values and associate themselves with you.  That&#8217;s a much deeper relationship.</p>
<p>I do think the content has to be relevant.  Long pages of boring text may be good for the search engine to index but lots of people don&#8217;t want to read too much!</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

